What is the difference between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0?
Web 2.0 is a popular word that is commonly used to include diverse and novel processes on the World Wide Web. Even if it is primarily a marketing term, some key estimates relate to Web 2.0 including the emergence of social networks, two-way communication, various "glue" technologies and substantial multiplicity of content types. While most Web 2.0 runs on the same platform as 1.0, there are some key differences. Our goal is to identify the fundamental differences that lead to the characterization of 2.0
Web 2.0 has incorporated concepts into the Web in recent years. Accurate definitions are subtle and difficult to classify with the binary tag "Web 1.0" or "Web 2.0". However, a group of very popular Web 2.0 sites (such as Facebook and YouTube) and the old network between the neat separation.
One of the main differences between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0 is that there are very few content creators in Web 1.0, and only a simple majority of users are simply consumers of content, Any user can be a content generator in Web 2.0, and various technical assistance has been added to increase the potential for content generation
Another difference between Web 2.0 and Web 1.0 can be based on time. The term "Web 2.0" was created around 2004, and many of the first real Web 2.0 sites began in late 2003 and early 2004. Some of the key features of Web 2.0 are that these sites encourage users to spend as much time on their Web sites as possible. Web sites such as IMDB may be viewed as Web 1.0 (such as IMDB).
. They provide a strong induction to increase the site's viscosity. In Web 1.0, most sites have links to external sites, and users can easily track links to other sites. The main reason is that most Web 1.0 sites tend to cover a single topic and do not require users to log in to access them. Web 2.0 sites, on the other hand, encourage internal activity on the site, often requiring users to sign in and create links to other people on the site.
Web 1.0 sites are used for one-way communication, while Web 2.0 sites build two-way communication media. Web 1.0 is proprietary and top-down. On the other hand, Web 2.0 is democratic and bottom-up. Not the New York Times 1.0 Web site, telling you what's important for a day's story, Digg.com, Buzz, and Yahoo! Web site describes the most critical stories of user votes
Web 1.0 site is clearly passive read. Web 2.0 sites attract participation, vote up and down, grade, comment, and submit new posts. Amazon.com is allowing users to review books by the year 2000, but now users can participate in many different ways such as creating product listings, writing product guides, and editing wiki articles (Amapedia). In 2000, Amazon used its Web site to sell its products. With Web 2.0, Amazon now allows you to list and sell your own old and new books and products through its Web site.
Web 1.0 sites are static and rarely change Web 2.0 sites are dynamic, changing hourly or more frequently, thinking about all of these users sharing. The following table highlights the differences between Web 2.0 and Web 1.0, and compares what happens when the culture of the Web is flipped.
The Web 2.0 Web site is a closed site,
This is about the client server
This is about
This is about reading
It is about wires
This is about the homepage
This is about the portal
This is about the classification
This is the form on the web
This is about the network form
This is the network form
It is edited and produced
It is about the blog
It is about the blog
It is about the RSS
It's about the label
It is about the Web application
It is about the trade
It is about the Internet
It is the original
It is about the broadband